<< Previous Section | Table of Contents | The Polar Planimeter | Page Numbers | Next Section >> |
As to the saving in time and labor, it is too evident to need any discussion and a statement of the results of comparative tests of this with other methods would seem like exaggeration until the reader had tested the matter for himself.
Mr. Herschell in the article already referred to says as the results of comparative tests made by himself that the “saving of time derived from the use of the Planimeter over that required by calculating from tables or from formulas, was as 1/2 to 4/5”, and that the degree of accuracy practically attained “surpasses what in any ordinary work has hitherto been considered practically attainable.” He also estimates the probable error as not greater than two yards in one thousand. It will take but little experience with this form of calculation to prove all of these estimates both as to saving of time and accuracy to be well upon the conservative side.
<< Previous Section | Table of Contents | The Polar Planimeter | Page Numbers | Next Section >> |